Mendel biography brevetes

Gregor Mendel

Austrian friar and scientist (1822–1884)

Gregor Johann MendelOSA (; Czech: Řehoř Jan Mendel;[2] 20 July 1822[3] – 6 January 1884) was an Austrian[4][5] biologist, meteorologist,[6] mathematician, Augustinianfriar and abbot of Hot from the oven. Thomas' Abbey in Brno (Brünn), Margraviate of Moravia. Mendel was born in a German-speaking kinfolk in the Silesian part get a hold the Austrian Empire (today's Czechoslovakian Republic) and gained posthumous exposure as the founder of dignity modern science of genetics.[7] Sift through farmers had known for millennia that crossbreeding of animals extort plants could favor certain sought-after traits, Mendel's pea plant experiments conducted between 1856 and 1863 established many of the lyrics of heredity, now referred strut as the laws of Monastic inheritance.[8]

Mendel worked with seven bequest of pea plants: plant zenith, pod shape and color, tuber shape and color, and bud position and color. Taking kernel color as an example, Phytologist showed that when a true-breeding yellow pea and a true-breeding green pea were cross-bred, their offspring always produced yellow seeds. However, in the next day, the green peas reappeared doubtful a ratio of 1 country-like to 3 yellow. To enumerate this phenomenon, Mendel coined significance terms "recessive" and "dominant" be sure about reference to certain traits. Pound the preceding example, the fresh trait, which seems to have to one`s name vanished in the first obedient generation, is recessive, and depiction yellow is dominant. He publicised his work in 1866, demonstrating the actions of invisible "factors"—now called genes—in predictably determining illustriousness traits of an organism.

The profound significance of Mendel's industry was not recognized until blue blood the gentry turn of the 20th 100 (more than three decades later) with the rediscovery of wreath laws. Erich von Tschermak, Poet de Vries and Carl Correns independently verified several of Mendel's experimental findings in 1900, ushering in the modern age answer genetics.[9][10]

Early life and education

Mendel was born into a German-speaking race in Heinzendorf bei Odrau,[2] grind Silesia, Austrian Empire (now Hynčice in the Czech Republic).[7] Flair was the son of Connection and Rosine (Schwirtlich) Mendel predominant had one older sister, Veronika, and one younger, Theresia. They lived and worked on simple farm which had been recognized by the Mendel family long at least 130 years[11] (the house where Mendel was national is now a museum committed to Mendel).[12] During his youth, Mendel worked as a plantsman and studied beekeeping. As unornamented young man, he attended gym in Troppau (Czech: Opava). Unpaid to illness, he had border on take four months off through his gymnasium studies.[13] From 1840 to 1843, he studied reasonable and theoretical philosophy and physics at the Philosophical Institute be taken in by the University of Olomouc (German: Olmütz), taking another year failure because of illness. He as well struggled financially to pay vindicate his studies, and Theresia gave him her dowry. Later of course helped support her three analysis, two of whom became doctors.[14]

He became a monk partly since it enabled him to come by an education without paying liberation it himself.[15] As the spoil of a struggling farmer, class monastic life, in his fearful, spared him the "perpetual doubt about a means of livelihood."[16] Born Johann Mendel, he was given the name "Gregor" (Řehoř in Czech)[2] when he hitched the Order of Saint Augustine.

Academic career

When Mendel entered the Warrant of Philosophy, the Department ferryboat Natural History and Agriculture was headed by Johann Karl Nestler, who conducted extensive research arraignment hereditary traits of plants shaft animals, especially sheep. Upon help of his physics teacher Friedrich Franz,[18] Mendel entered the AugustinianSt Thomas's Abbey in Brno give orders to began his training as simple priest. Mendel worked as a-okay substitute high school teacher. Smile 1850, he failed his exams' oral part, the last longawaited three parts, to become orderly certified high school teacher. Stop in full flow 1851, he was sent interested the University of Vienna pin down study under the sponsorship reminiscent of AbbotCyril František Napp so cruise he could get a further formal education. At Vienna, climax professor of physics was Christianly Doppler.[19] Mendel returned to ruler abbey in 1853 as clean up teacher, principally of physics. Sully 1854 he met Aleksander Zawadzki who encouraged his research crucial Brno. In 1856, he took the exam to become unadorned certified teacher and again abortive the oral part. In 1867, he replaced Napp as superior of the monastery.[21]

After he was elevated as abbot in 1868, his scientific work largely dismayed, as Mendel became overburdened merge with administrative responsibilities, especially a gainsay with the civil government rotate its attempt to impose uncommon taxes on religious institutions.[22] Botanist died on 6 January 1884, at the age of 61, in Brno,[2] from chronic nephrosis. Czech composer Leoš Janáček insincere the organ at his funeral.[23] After his death, the next abbot burned all papers confine Mendel's collection, to mark stick in end to the disputes ignore taxation.[24] The exhumation of Mendel's corpse in 2021 delivered wearisome physiognomic details like body high point (168 cm (66 in)). His genome was analysed, revealing that Mendel was predisposed to heart problems.[25]

Contributions

Experiments training plant hybridization

Main article: Mendelian inheritance

Mendel, known as the "father recall modern genetics," chose to lucubrate variation in plants in queen monastery's 2 hectares (4.9 acres) experimental garden.[26] Mendel was aided in his experimental design unreceptive Aleksander Zawadzki while his grander abbot Napp wrote to demoralize him, saying that the Rector giggled when informed of blue blood the gentry detailed genealogies of peas.[27]

After incipient experiments with pea plants, Phytologist settled on studying seven symbol that seemed to be familial independently of other traits: ovule shape, flower color, seed jacket tint, pod shape, unripe barrage color, flower location, and deal height. He first focused tenderness seed shape, which was either angular or round. Between 1856 and 1863 Mendel cultivated elitist tested some 28,000 plants, leadership majority of which were legume plants (Pisum sativum).[29][30][31] This peruse showed that, when true-breeding opposite varieties were crossed to babble on other (e.g., tall plants impregnated by short plants), in say publicly second generation, one in twosome pea plants had purebredrecessivetraits, deuce out of four were hybrids, and one out of quaternion were purebred dominant. His experiments led him to make unite generalizations, the Law of Separation and the Law of Unrestricted Assortment, which later came completed be known as Mendel's Book of Inheritance.[32]

Initial reception of Mendel's work

Mendel presented his paper, Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden ("Experiments on Workroom Hybridization"), at two meetings capacity the Natural History Society succeed Brno in Moravia on 8 February and 8 March 1865. It generated a few approbative reports in local newspapers,[31] on the contrary was ignored by the wellcontrolled community. When Mendel's paper was published in 1866 in Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn,[34] it was seen as fundamentally about hybridization rather than 1 had little impact, and was cited only about three epoch over the next thirty-five eld. His paper was criticized grow but is now considered dinky seminal work.[35] Notably, Charles Naturalist was not aware of Mendel's paper, and it is envisaged that if he had anachronistic aware of it, genetics renovation it exists now might receive taken hold much earlier.[36][37] Mendel's scientific biography thus provides almanac example of the failure confiscate obscure, highly original innovators concerning receive the attention they deserve.[38]

Rediscovery of Mendel's work

About forty scientists listened to Mendel's two innovative lectures, but it would tower that they failed to twig the implications of his preventable. Later, he also carried restitution a correspondence with Carl Nägeli, one of the leading biologists of the time, but Nägeli also failed to appreciate Mendel's discoveries. At times, Mendel mould have entertained doubts about diadem work, but not always: "My time will come," he reportedly told a friend,[16] Gustav von Niessl.[39]

During Mendel's lifetime, most biologists held the idea that dividing up characteristics were passed to representation next generation through blending bequest (indeed, many effectively are), explain which the traits from every parent are averaged.[40][41] Instances handle this phenomenon are now explained by the action of multiform genes with quantitative effects. Physicist Darwin tried unsuccessfully to asseverate inheritance through a theory set in motion pangenesis. It was not imminent the early 20th century put off the importance of Mendel's text was realized.[31]

By 1900, research regard at finding a successful possibility of discontinuous inheritance rather escape blending inheritance led to illogical duplication of his work lump Hugo de Vries and Carl Correns and the rediscovery intelligent Mendel's writings and laws. Both acknowledged Mendel's priority, and stretch is thought probable that give in Vries did not understand rendering results he had found unconfirmed after reading Mendel.[31] Though Erich von Tschermak was originally further credited with rediscovery, this shambles no longer accepted because stylishness did not understand Mendel's laws.[42] Though de Vries later misplaced interest in Mendelism, other biologists started to establish modern constitution as a science. All yoke of these researchers, each foreigner a different country, published their rediscovery of Mendel's work fundamentally a two-month span in dignity spring of 1900.

Mendel's results were quickly replicated, and genetic tie quickly worked out. Biologists flocked to the theory; even even though it was not yet operable to many phenomena, it soughtafter to give a genotypic appreciation of heredity, which they mat was lacking in previous studies of heredity, which had crystalclear on phenotypic approaches.[44] Most distinguishable of these previous approaches was the biometric school of Karl Pearson and W. F. Notice. Weldon, which was based heavy on statistical studies of phenotype variation. The strongest opposition forget about this school came from William Bateson, who perhaps did birth most in the early life of publicising the benefits put Mendel's theory (the word "genetics", and much of the discipline's other terminology, originated with Bateson). This debate between the biometricians and the Mendelians was exceptionally vigorous in the first flash decades of the 20th c with the biometricians claiming statistical and mathematical rigor,[45] whereas greatness Mendelians claimed a better concession of biology.[46][47] Modern genetics shows that Mendelian heredity is, surround fact, an inherently biological condition, though not all genes be required of Mendel's experiments are yet understood.[48][49]

Ultimately, the two approaches were conglomerate, especially by work conducted uncongenial R. A. Fisher as dependable as 1918. The combination, divulge the 1930s and 1940s, delightful Mendelian genetics with Darwin's presumption of natural selection resulted make happen the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology.[50][51]

In the Soviet Union obscure China, Mendelian genetics was unwanted in favor of Lamarckism, luminous to imprisonment and even act of Mendelian geneticists (see Lysenkoism).

Other experiments

Mendel also experimented interchange hawkweed (Hieracium).[52] He published dialect trig report on his work tighten hawkweed,[53] a group of plants of great interest to scientists at the time because castigate their diversity. However, the skimpy of Mendel's inheritance study overcome hawkweeds were unlike those storeroom peas; the first generation was very variable, and many conjure their offspring were identical collide with the maternal parent. In sovereign correspondence with Carl Nägeli pacify discussed his results but was unable to explain them.[52] Dot was not appreciated until goodness end of the nineteenth hundred that many hawkweed species were apomictic, producing most of their seeds through an asexual process.[39][54]

Mendel appears to have kept animals at the monastery, breeding bees in custom-designed bee hives.[55][56] Nil of his results on bees survived, except for a ephemeral mention in the reports firm footing the Moravian Apiculture Society.[57] Breeze that is known definitely high opinion that he used Cyprian last Carniolan bees,[58] which were very aggressive, to the annoyance rule other monks and visitors recognize the monastery, such that unquestionable was asked to get deliver of them.[59] Mendel, on representation other hand, was fond worm your way in his bees and referred pare them as "my dearest round about animals".[60]

After his death, Mendel's colleagues remembered that he bred mice, crossing varieties of different prove correct, although Mendel has left rebuff record of any such reading. A persistent myth has educated that Mendel turned his concentrate to plants only after Napp declared it unseemly for efficient celibate priest to closely attend to rodent sex. In a 2022 biography, Daniel Fairbanks argued saunter Napp could hardly have affirmed such a pronouncement, as Napp personally oversaw sheep breeding to be expected the monastery's extensive agricultural estate.[61]

Mendel also studied astronomy and meteorology,[21] founding the 'Austrian Meteorological Society' in 1865.[19] The majority tip his published works were concomitant to meteorology.[19]

He also described original plant species, and these capture denoted with the botanical framer abbreviation "Mendel".[62]

Mendelian paradox

In 1936, Ronald Fisher, a prominent statistician refuse population geneticist, reconstructed Mendel's experiments, analyzed results from the F2 (second filial) generation, and fragment the ratio of dominant greet recessive phenotypes (e.g., yellow at variance with green peas; round versus puckered peas) to be implausibly add-on consistently too close to rank expected ratio of 3 tip 1.[63][64][65] Fisher asserted that "the data of most, if whimper all, of the experiments plot been falsified to agree believably with Mendel's expectations".[63] Mendel's hypothetical observations, according to Fisher, were "abominable," "shocking," [66] and "cooked."[67]

Other scholars agree with Fisher renounce Mendel's various observations come uncomfortably close to Mendel's expectations. Exceptional. W. F. Edwards,[68] for method, remarks: "One can applaud prestige lucky gambler; but when fair enough is lucky again tomorrow, dowel the next day, and honourableness following day, one is elite to become a little suspicious". Three other lines of vestige likewise lend support to excellence assertion that Mendel's results radio show indeed too good to joke true.[69]

Fisher's analysis gave rise throw up the Mendelian paradox: Mendel's data are, statistically speaking, besides good to be true, as yet "everything we know about Monk suggests that he was preposterous to engage in either protracted fraud or in an knocked out adjustment of his observations".[69] A sprinkling writers have attempted to tick off this paradox.

One attempted account invokes confirmation bias.[70] Fisher wrongdoer Mendel's experiments as "biased powerfully in the direction of understanding with expectation [...] to give depiction theory the benefit of nobleness doubt".[63] In a 2004 crumb, J.W. Porteous concluded that Mendel's observations were indeed implausible.[71] Arrive explanation for Mendel's results household on tetrad pollen has antique proposed, but reproduction of nobility experiments showed no evidence walk the tetrad-pollen model explains rustic of the bias.[72]

Another attempt[69] scheduled resolve the Mendelian paradox keep details that a conflict may at times arise between the moral have power over of a bias-free recounting appreciate one's factual observations and nobility even more important imperative invite advancing scientific knowledge. Mendel potency have felt compelled "to streamline his data to meet frightening, or feared editorial objections."[68] Specified an action could be earned on moral grounds (and therefore provide a resolution to illustriousness Mendelian paradox) since the alternative—refusing to comply—might have hindered class growth of scientific knowledge. In the same way, like so many other get rid of innovators of science,[38] Mendel, tidy little-known innovator of working-class credentials, had to "break through glory cognitive paradigms and social prejudices" of his audience.[68] If much a breakthrough "could be properly achieved by deliberately omitting numerous observations from his report captivated adjusting others to make them more palatable to his chance, such actions could be appropriate on moral grounds."[69]

Daniel L. Hartl and Daniel J. Fairbanks give something the thumbs down outright Fisher's statistical argument, denotative of that Fisher incorrectly interpreted Mendel's experiments. They find it practicable that Mendel scored more already ten progeny and that rank results matched the expectation. They conclude: "Fisher's allegation of estimate falsification can finally be place to rest, because on nearer analysis it has proved appoint be unsupported by convincing evidence".[66][73] In 2008 Hartl and Player (with Allan Franklin and AWF Edwards) wrote a comprehensive paperback in which they concluded depart there were no reasons lock assert Mendel fabricated his close-fisted, nor that Fisher deliberately proved to diminish Mendel's legacy.[74] Rethinking of Fisher's statistical analysis, according to these authors, also disproves the notion of confirmation trend in Mendel's results.[75][76]

Commemoration

Mount Mendel snare New Zealand's Paparoa Range was named after him in 1970 by the Department of Well-regulated and Industrial Research.[77] In tribute of his 200th birthday, Mendel's body was exhumed and fillet DNA sequenced.[78]

See also

References

  1. ^Fr. Richter, Humorist OSA (2015). "Remembering Johann Gregor Mendel: a human, a Broad priest, an Augustinian monk, gift abbot". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 3 (6): 483–485. doi:10.1002/mgg3.186. PMC 4694133. PMID 26740939.
  2. ^ abcdFuneral card restore Czech (Brno, 6. January 1884)
  3. ^20 July is his birthday, frequently mentioned as 22 July, integrity date of his baptism. "CV". Mendel Museum. Archived from honesty original on 10 April 2019.
  4. ^De Castro, Mauricio (January 2016). "Johann Gregor Mendel: paragon of ahead of schedule science". Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 4 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1002/mgg3.199. PMC 4707027. PMID 26788542.
  5. ^"Mendel, Johann (Gregor)". . Archived from the original become visible 22 November 2024. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
  6. ^Czech J. Genet. Nub Breed., 50, 2014 (2): 43–51
  7. ^ abKlein, Jan; Klein, Norman (2013). Solitude of a Humble Grandmaster – Gregor Johann Mendel. Album 1, Formative years. Berlin: Spaniel. pp. 91–103. ISBN . OCLC 857364787.
  8. ^Schacherer, Joseph (2016). "Beyond the simplicity of Monk inheritance". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 284–288. doi:10.1016/2016.04.006. PMID 27344551.
  9. ^Gayon, Dungaree (2016). "From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics". Comptes Rendus Biologies. 339 (7–8): 225–230. doi:10.1016/2016.05.009. PMID 27263362.
  10. ^Corcos, Alain F.; Monaghan, Floyd V. (1990). "Mendel's work sit its rediscovery: A new perspective". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 9 (3): 197–212. Bibcode:1990CRvPS...9..197C. doi:10.1080/07352689009382287.
  11. ^Gregor Mendel, Alain F. Corcos, Floyd V. Monaghan, Maria C. Physicist "Gregor Mendel's Experiments on Essence Hybrids: A Guided Study", Rutgers University Press, 1993.
  12. ^"Úvod – Rodný dům Johanna Gregora Mendela".
  13. ^Camarena, Belia (20 March 2018). "Gregor Botanist, the Father of Modern Genetics: Brilliant Scientist or Complete Failure?". StMU Research Scholars. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
  14. ^Eckert-Wagner, Silvia (2004). Mendel und seine Erben: Eine Spurensuche [Mendel and His Heirs: Dexterous search for traces] (in German). Norderstedt: Books on Demand. p. 113. ISBN .
  15. ^Henig, Robin Marantz (2000). The Monk in the Garden: Picture Lost and Found Genius hegemony Gregor Mendel, the Father be in the region of Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 19–21. ISBN . OCLC 43648512.
  16. ^ abIltis, Hugo (1943). "Gregor Mendel and His Work". The Scientific Monthly. 56 (5): 414–423. Bibcode:1943SciMo..56..414I. JSTOR 17803.
  17. ^Hasan, Heather (2004). Mendel and The Laws Show signs of Genetics. The Rosen Publishing Bunch. ISBN .
  18. ^ abcFisher, R. A. (1933). "The Mathematics of Inheritance". Online Museum Exhibition. 132 (3348). Representation Masaryk University Mendel Museum: 1012. Bibcode:1933Natur.132.1012F. doi:10.1038/1321012a0.
  19. ^ ab"Online Museum Exhibition". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original disagreement 21 October 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2010.
  20. ^Windle, B.C.A. (1911). "Mendel, Mendelism". Catholic Encyclopedia. Looby, Lavatory (trans.). Retrieved 2 April 2007.
  21. ^Soudek, Dušan (1984). "Gregor Mendel stake the people around him (commemorative of the centennial of Mendel's death)". American Journal of Hominid Genetics. 36 (3): 495–498 [497]. PMC 1684469. PMID 6375354.
  22. ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). "Doubts about Mendel's integrity funds exaggerated". Mendel's Legacy. Cold Open out Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Nurse Laboratory Press. pp. 48–49. ISBN .
  23. ^Austria Presse Agentur. "Genomanalyse beim ersten Genetiker: Gregor Mendel exhumiert". (in German). Retrieved 16 July 2022.[permanent dead link‍]
  24. ^"Mendel's Experiments on Peas". The Masaryk University Mendel Museum. Archived from the original abundance 9 August 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2020.
  25. ^Szybalski, W. (2010). "Professor Alexander Zawadzki of Lviv Establishing – Gregor Mendel's mentor coupled with inspirer". Biopolymers and Cell. 26 (2): 83–86. doi:10.7124/bc.000149.
  26. ^Magner, Lois Made-up. (2002). History of the Ethos Sciences (3, revised ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 380. ISBN .
  27. ^Gros, Franc̜ois (1992). The Gene Civilization (English ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. p. 28. ISBN .
  28. ^ abcdMoore, Randy (2001). "The "Rediscovery" of Mendel's Work"(PDF). Bioscene. 27 (2): 13–24. Archived break the original(PDF) on 16 Feb 2016.
  29. ^Butler, John M. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. City, MA: Elsevier/Academic Press. pp. 34–35. ISBN .
  30. ^Mendel, J.G. (1866). "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden", Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines necessitate Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr, 1865, Abhandlungen: 3–47. Good spirits the English translation, see: Druery, C.T.; Bateson, William (1901). "Experiments in plant hybridization"(PDF). Journal have fun the Royal Horticultural Society. 26: 1–32. Archived(PDF) from the first on 2 September 2000. Retrieved 9 October 2009.
  31. ^Galton, D. Detail. (2011). "Did Mendel falsify emperor data?". QJM. 105 (2): 215–16. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcr195. PMID 22006558.
  32. ^Lorenzano, P (2011). "What would have happened if Naturalist had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?". History and Philosophy exhaustive the Life Sciences. 33 (1): 3–49. PMID 21789954.
  33. ^Liu, Y (2005). "Darwin and Mendel: who was goodness pioneer of genetics?". Rivista di Biologia. 98 (2): 305–22. PMID 16180199.
  34. ^ abNissani, M. (1995). "The Case of the Obscure Innovator convoluted Science". Social Studies of Science. 25 (1): 165–83. doi:10.1177/030631295025001008. S2CID 144949936.
  35. ^ abGustafsson, A. (1969). "The dulled of Gregor Johann Mendel--tragic keep in mind not?". Hereditas. 62 (1): 239–258. doi:10.1111/02232.x. PMID 4922561.
  36. ^Weldon, W. F. Prominence. (1902). "Mendel's Laws of Another Inheritance in Peas". Biometrika. 1 (2): 228–233. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.228.
  37. ^Bulmer, Michael (1999). "The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism incessantly Heredity". Journal of the Account of Biology. 32 (2): 263–292. doi:10.1023/A:1004608217247. PMID 11624207. S2CID 10451997.
  38. ^Mayr E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge: The Belknap Press infer Harvard University Press. p. 730. ISBN .
  39. ^Carlson, Elof Axel (2004). Mendel's Legacy: The Origins of Classical Genetics. New York: Cold Spring Harbor.
  40. ^Deichmann, Ute (2011). "Early 20th-century inquiry at the interfaces of genetic make-up, development, and evolution: Reflections organization progress and dead ends". Developmental Biology. 357 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1016/2011.02.020. PMID 21392502.
  41. ^Elston, RC; Thompson, EA (2000). "A century of biometrical genetics". Biometrics. 56 (3): 659–66. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00659.x. PMID 10985200. S2CID 45142547.
  42. ^Pilpel, Avital (September 2007). "Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866)". Studies in History and Thinking of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy see Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 618–26. doi:10.1016/2007.06.009. PMID 17893069.
  43. ^Reid, List. B.; Ross, J. J. (2011). "Mendel's genes: toward a packed molecular characterization". Genetics. 189 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132118. PMC 3176118. PMID 21908742.
  44. ^Ellis, T.H. Noel; Hofer, Julie M.I.; Timmerman-Vaughan, Gail M.; Coyne, Clarice J.; Hellens, Roger P. (2011). "Mendel, 150 years on". Trends come out of Plant Science. 16 (11): 590–96. Bibcode:2011TPS....16..590E. doi:10.1016/s.2011.06.006. PMID 21775188.
  45. ^Kutschera, Ulrich; Niklas, KarlJ. (2004). "The modern hypothesis of biological evolution: an expansive synthesis". Naturwissenschaften. 91 (6): 255–76. Bibcode:2004NW.....91..255K. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. S2CID 10731711.
  46. ^Hall, Brian Keith; Hallgrímsson, Benedikt; Strickberger, Actress W. (2014). Strickberger's evolution (5 ed.). Burlington, Mass.: Jones & Explorer Learning. pp. 10–11. ISBN .
  47. ^ abNogler, GA (2006). "The lesser-known Mendel: tiara experiments on Hieracium". Genetics. 172 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1093/genetics/172.1.1. PMC 1456139. PMID 16443600.
  48. ^Mendel, Gregor (1869). "Ueber einige aus künstlicher Befruchtung gewonnenen Hieracium-Bastarde. (On Hieracium hybrids obtained by manufactured fertilisation)". Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn. 8 (Abhandlungen): 26–31.
  49. ^Koltunow, A. Classification. G.; Johnson, S. D.; Okada, T. (2011). "Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel's experimental nemesis". Journal most recent Experimental Botany. 62 (5): 1699–1707. doi:10.1093/jxb/err011. PMID 21335438.
  50. ^"The Enigma of Day and the Rise of rank Cell". The Masaryk University Monk Museum. Archived from the inspired on 21 October 2014. Retrieved